SD format Zigbee card ...
wolfgang at sharism.cc
Mon Dec 7 01:58:07 EST 2009
Richard et al.,
Spectec agreed to reduce the price of the 'sample kit' from 1000 USD to
500 USD. That kit includes two microSD ZigBee cards, plus some 'sample source
code'. I agreed to the new price, but when I said I would pick it up today they
said it's not yet available :-)
They will update me when it's available.
Also our contact there (Justin Chen) sent me a SDZ-537 datasheet, which is
a very high level 19-page PDF file describing a few Windows DLL APIs.
Of course it's marked 'confidential' without any further information regarding
releasibility and such. I will not pass it on right now.
Justin also said
Good to know X86 souce code is useful for you and I'll have our engineer speed up code release.
Meanwhile, I'd suggest you to study what ZigBee applications you want to develop.
Please be informed our current ZigBee card has TI Z-Stack but no ZigBee profile included.
And the smaple code is just a simple demo program to prove our ZigBee card is able to connect and transmit data to other ZigBee devices.
Normally our customers purchase the sample kit as well as firmware burning machine to develop their own application/firmware.
The cost of firmware burning device is US$1,200/set ExWorks Taiwan.
Or you could send us your firmware and we'll load it onto the card for you if you don't have a plan to purchase it at this stage.
I don't know enough about ZigBee right now, so I'm not sure about 'profiles',
and what this 'firmware burning machine' is. I am hoping everything is open
and reflashable/reprogrammable in software. That's just me hoping... :-)
I am trying to find out more.
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 10:17:15AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Wolfgang Spraul <wolfgang at sharism.cc> wrote:
> > Richard,
> >> I did read it. The problem is that I want to write a GPL'd driver, but
> >> using their sample code can compromise the licence that the driver
> >> could be released under.
> > ahh yes, good point. Of course we want to write a GPL'd driver, I will ask
> > them about the license of the source codes we would get.
> > Most likely they have never thought about it :-)
> > If the source codes would be released as 'public domain', I think that would
> > still allow us to reference, or even cut & paste, from these sources into
> > a properly GPL'd driver?
> > Most likely we will only want to treat these sources as documentation
> > anyway, to find out which addresses map to which port of the chip etc.
> > So even if they come under a totally undefined "Copyright Spectec. All
> > rights reserved." license without further information, we can treat them
> > like we would treat any other openly available PDF datasheet.
> > That's my theory. What do you think?
> > I will ask Spectec about the license...
> If it was just the .h files then I think we have few problems. .h
> files are like a list of constants and data structures that must be
> used to interface with the device.
> If it includes .c files then we are in greyer legal territory.
> A waiver from SpecTec would be useful, although if their stuff is
> derived from source code from TI, they might be reluctant to issue
> such a waiver.
> Richard Sharpe
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer
More information about the discussion