what do you think of nand partitions.

Wolfgang Spraul wolfgang at sharism.cc
Mon Dec 7 03:51:32 EST 2009

> Thats a really bad idea in my opinion, because it will increase the
> boot time by a lot.

OK then let's decide to leave the kernel outside.
I forgot that there is no way to hand-over the filesystem initialization
data from bootloader to kernel, so indeed it has to be done twice.
Speed should be our #1 optimization criteria, I think. Speed is addictive.
I hope we can keep the whole system easily updatable though...


On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 08:19:46AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi
> Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> > How about moving the kernel into the rootfs? My personal preference
> > is to have the kernel in the rootfs, and since we use u-boot
> > filesystem support should be quite good, it seems even UBIFS is
> > supported? Wolfgang
> Thats a really bad idea in my opinion, because it will increase the
> boot time by a lot. The advantage of having the kernel in it's own
> partition is that you don't have parse complex filesystem structures
> but can start right away with loading the kernel.
> Having to parse the metadata of a 300 MB filesystem will probably
> increase boot time by a few seconds. [1]
> - - Lars
> [1] http://openinkpot.org/wiki/Device/N516/Bootchart
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> LQCfYpQor+glGEgAMGk5e5yYAEBeb1U=
> =33Wn
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer

More information about the discussion mailing list