Kernel GPL

Lars-Peter Clausen lars at metafoo.de
Tue Nov 17 20:29:37 EST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> Kristoffer, I'm pretty sure all code is GPL'ed, we pay great
> attention to this. Which code exactly are you referring to? The
> .patch files in the openwrt tree should all be clean, properly
> licensed under v2 or higher. If you see anything suspicious on the
> licensing side, please let me know. Wolfgang
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:12:32PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Was wondering, is all the code up on wiki (kernel source) GPLed?
>> Was planing to perhaps make a stable snapshot (ex. v2.6.32) on my
>> kernel.org repository, but it needs to be GPLed before I can do
>> that.
>>
>> Best wishes Kristoffer
Hi

This reminds me: arch/mips/jz4740/board-qi_lb60.c is currently
licensed under GPLv3. But as it is a part of the kernel it should be
licensed under GPLv2.

Xiangfu you are listed as Copyright holder. Would be nice if you could
re-license the file.

- - Lars
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAksDTgEACgkQBX4mSR26RiOqggCfRMqYHteAdNrqogOxZah3OE1R
G0EAnj/5AB9Lln47jBYXD+7XHkcBDL/o
=JFF+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the discussion mailing list


interactive