Kernel GPL

Wolfgang Spraul wolfgang at qi-hardware.com
Tue Nov 17 20:34:26 EST 2009


Lars,

> Xiangfu you are listed as Copyright holder. Would be nice if you could
> re-license the file.

In general I prefer GPL v3 for anything new.
In the case of the kernel, maybe we should do "v2 or higher"?

Wolfgang

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:29:37AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> > Kristoffer, I'm pretty sure all code is GPL'ed, we pay great
> > attention to this. Which code exactly are you referring to? The
> > .patch files in the openwrt tree should all be clean, properly
> > licensed under v2 or higher. If you see anything suspicious on the
> > licensing side, please let me know. Wolfgang
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:12:32PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> Was wondering, is all the code up on wiki (kernel source) GPLed?
> >> Was planing to perhaps make a stable snapshot (ex. v2.6.32) on my
> >> kernel.org repository, but it needs to be GPLed before I can do
> >> that.
> >>
> >> Best wishes Kristoffer
> Hi
> 
> This reminds me: arch/mips/jz4740/board-qi_lb60.c is currently
> licensed under GPLv3. But as it is a part of the kernel it should be
> licensed under GPLv2.
> 
> Xiangfu you are listed as Copyright holder. Would be nice if you could
> re-license the file.
> 
> - - Lars
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAksDTgEACgkQBX4mSR26RiOqggCfRMqYHteAdNrqogOxZah3OE1R
> G0EAnj/5AB9Lln47jBYXD+7XHkcBDL/o
> =JFF+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer




More information about the discussion mailing list


interactive