Kernel GPL

Kristoffer Ericson kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com
Wed Nov 18 10:18:01 EST 2009


On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:06:20 -0500
Wolfgang Spraul <wolfgang at qi-hardware.com> wrote:

> Kristoffer,
> I'm pretty sure all code is GPL'ed, we pay great attention to this.
> Which code exactly are you referring to?
> The .patch files in the openwrt tree should all be clean, properly licensed
> under v2 or higher.
> If you see anything suspicious on the licensing side, please let me know.
> Wolfgang

Just asking before diving into kernel code. I will be making
a snapshot once 2.6.32 comes out and merge it into v2.6.30-hpc branch on my tree.
Its always nice to have a "stable" snapshot.

> 
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:12:32PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > Was wondering, is all the code up on wiki (kernel source) GPLed? Was planing to perhaps make a stable snapshot (ex. v2.6.32)
> > on my kernel.org repository, but it needs to be GPLed before I can do that. 
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > Kristoffer
> > 
> > -- 
> > Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qi Developer Mailing List
> > Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> > Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer


-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com>




More information about the discussion mailing list


interactive