opkg vs apt vs ipkg
Florian Fainelli
florian at openwrt.org
Thu Feb 4 14:17:56 EST 2010
Le jeudi 4 février 2010 19:24:25, Ron K. Jeffries a écrit :
> Jon,
> ipkg and opkg are very similar.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipkg
>
> What I am not sure of where we stand in terms of
> an easily available set of packages compiled for
> MIPS and that work on Nanonote.
>
> Can someone comment on that?
All the mipsel repository of openwrt works on Nanonote [1]. More generally any
repository compiled with for mips32r1 CPU will work, of course the libc
version should match ;)
[1] : http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/brcm47xx/packages/
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 09:53, Jon Phillips <jon at sharism.cc> wrote:
> > I want to say we have an APT store not some shitty APP store with
> > shareware on it. Why can't we use apt-get and/or why aren't we using opkg
> > rather than ipkg. Can someone fill me in?
> >
> > thanks
> > Jon
> >
> > --
> > Jon Phillips
> > http://rejon.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer
>
--
Best regards, Florian Fainelli
Email: florian at openwrt.org
Web: http://openwrt.org
IRC: [florian] on irc.freenode.net
-------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100204/e23067eb/attachment.pgp>
More information about the discussion
mailing list