kevyn.alexandre.pare at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 12:04:21 EST 2010
Thx, maybe this was New Year maintenance ;)
Sébastien Bourdeauducq says :
It's *always* a harder task to write a parallel program than a sequential one,
which should be avoided whenever possible
Summary from article:
If only, like the surviving members of his tribe, to say nothing of
today's heavily multitasking teenagers, this poor guy had been able to
In short, given the crucial role of concurrency in everyday life, do
you really want to assert that concurrency is counter-intuitive? If
so, on what basis do you defend your assertion?
The burden of proof rests firmly on your shoulders.
For Arduino I can understand concurrency.cc approach but there is
approach for Linux kernel:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Ron K. Jeffries <rjeffries at gmail.com> wrote:
> Try again. Both servers came up for me when I tried them just now.
> --ron jeffries
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:47, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré
> <kevyn.alexandre.pare at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Server not found!
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer
More information about the discussion