kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com
Sat Jan 16 08:47:56 EST 2010
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:05:28 +0100
Mirko Lindner <mirko at sharism.cc> wrote:
> Hey Kristoffer,
> great to have ya back after the exam :) How did it go by the way?
Felt good but you never know. It sucks to have one exam / Term, makes
it quite extensive.
Good to be back, btw gf is working on pictures so after weekend most likely.
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Kristoffer Ericson <
> kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey,
> > Read that 800 units are already made, have you talked when to manufacture
> > more
> > units (eg. after X number of units sold)?
> Haha, a question for the optimists :).
> We have not set a specific number as the breaking point, as we need to check
> how long that takes as well and what the demand is.
> Let me put it this way, whenever "we" and that includes this community,
> decide it is time to move on we will, but it may also be that we stick with
> the Ben for quite some time, as this little cute device has huge potential
> and everyone I meet and talk to gives me new ideas what could be done with
> it. Of course the economic side also plays its role.
> On the production side everything is prepared to easily manufacture more
> Bens, also in the light of special runs etc. catered to exactly one customer
> and all that.
> I personally hope that the first batch (the 800 plus a few ;) ) are only the
> beginning of a long row of Bens.
> So I guess the short answer to you questions is yes and no :) yes we have
> talked, no there is no list of criteria to met. It is gonna be an
> interesting ride :)
> Was this what you were after?
> Happy copylefting,
> > /Kristoffer
> > --
> > Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qi Developer Mailing List
> > Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> > Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com>
More information about the discussion