[Company] Weekly Operations Update 3 and 4/2010

Bas Wijnen wijnen at debian.org
Fri Jan 29 03:54:33 EST 2010


While I see the use of serial nnumbers for support, I don't see any
reason to reserve a special piece of software-readable hardware for
them.  The whole thing is open hardware anyway, user who want to change
the number can do so.  Why is a software-readable number better than an
eye-readable number (on a removable sticker)?  I don't think it should
make a difference for support.

The privacy-implications aren't big, but I don't think it's a good idea
to add minor privacy-violating options, just because we can.

If it's about warrenty, there's no problem either.  It is completely
normal (and reasonable) to void the warrenty by removing (or damaging) a


On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:34:24PM +0100, Polossatik wrote:
> >
> >> As a former support guy, yes, I'd rather have a SEEP
> >> (they are dirt cheap) so there is an electronically
> >> readable board version and serial number.
> >
> > Interesting, never heard of 'SEEP'. What is it?
> >
> Serial Electrically Erasable PROM
> Cheers,
> Gunther
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.qi-hardware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100129/4d664df4/attachment.pgp>

More information about the discussion mailing list