Not much luck sofar: issues
kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com
Thu Jul 1 05:59:30 EDT 2010
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:00:38PM -0300, Rafael Ignacio Zurita wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Hans Bezemer wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 June 2010, developer-request at lists.qi-hardware.com wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I think JLime is very interesting. It offers a lot more "user experience" than
> > OpenWrt. So far, I got nothing to show off than a Doom (without sound) and a
> > shell prompt.
> Sorry, I do not understand. You got a doom without sound and shell where? Jlime?
I think he was talking about openwrt, but cant be sure, it was somewhat fuzzy.
> > Then I heard Dingux executables work (mostly) out of the box. Can this be
> > confirmed? And finally - and perhaps more importantly - I got several
> > x-compilers working. Could the JLime toolchain produce proper executables for
> > OpenWrt too?
> I think that dingux binaries were working a bit in openwrt. I have not tried,
> but I guess that those will not work in jlime, too different toolchains and
> environments. Why do you want jlime binaries for openwrt?. The Jlime repository
> is built, just needs a few more packages to be complete (I mean, complete=no problems
> with dependences). Since both toolchains are too different I think that it
> is better to build packages for openwrt using openwrt toolchain, and the same
> for jlime. If jlimers want some packages in jlime they should use the same
> jlime toolchain. Perhaps I do not undertsand well what do you want to do..
> It is not a good idea to use binaries between distributions with differents
> toolchains, but that is just my thought, no the expert voice.
> Qi Developer Mailing List
> Mail to list (members only): developer at lists.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/developer
More information about the discussion