Open Hardware Creative Commons Draft
sebastien.bourdeauducq at lekernel.net
Thu Jul 15 12:28:29 EDT 2010
On Thursday 15 July 2010 15:46:21 Carlos Camargo wrote:
> Another topic is the hardware cost, you can release a hardware project that
> use 12 layer PCB, (...) complicated and expensive mounting techniques.
If we take those into account, the whole open hardware thing will be limited
to 1. low-tech stuff and/or 2. using proprietary pre-built modules (the
Arduino is a good example of these two points).
There should be no limit whatsoever on the technical level of open hardware
projects. Otherwise, it'll either remain something 3 nerds do in their garage
or something heavily depending on proprietary modules (by "module", I also
mean ICs beyond a certain level of integration).
> You can use
> privative (expensive, closed) software for design entry, you can release
> the design files, but you need to pay a big amount of money for the
> software and then you can modify the design files. Is important the use of
> open software tools like kicad, or geda for design entry.
Of course, it's better to use open tools, however, it should be allowed to
make a compromise in order to allow for greater technical advancement of the
overall project. Let's face it, today Kicad and gEDA suck when you compare
them to Protel and PADS.
More information about the discussion