What software ports are really missing?
jirka at penguin.cz
Thu Jul 8 03:03:49 EDT 2010
I have a question: what software is still have to be ported to our little
What do you need? I mean ports to the OpenWRT distribution.
I have tried to port several things with limited success.
Maybe you will want some of them (I can try to port them once more).
Here is the list (in random order):
- nut (nutrition manager) - it compiles (with warning about COPTS)
but it doesn´t run ("Segmentation fault.")
- calc (arbitrary precision calculator - you may know the "apcalc"
package in Debian) - it doesn't compile
- links 2.3 web browser - the white screen (of death...) in the graphical
the text mode is ok (I can provide Makefile and IPK for text-only
"links" - it
works better than elinks, BTW)
- gnuplot - unable to build package but binary can be compiled
(there is no mode for DirectFB; possibly the GGI can be used
but it will require more work)
- todo.sh (see todotxt.com - it's a simple but neat personal task manager)
works but have to be packaged (the bash and the real "sed" are needed)
- charm (LiveJournal/Blogger/... command line interface) - seems to work
but it have to be packaged (it's a Python script)
- clex (one-window file manager) - it requires a curses library
with support of wide characters (?)
- groff (GNU version of the roff, troff, nroff - it's needed for viewing
of man pages and it can be used for old-school typesetting) - it have
to be packaged (a distribution of this thing have to include a lot of
- ctopy (C to Python translator) - honestly, I newer tried to run this
- snownews (RSS feed reader) - some libraries are required to be ported
- yapet (password manager) - some functions are missing in the OpenSSL
library in OpenWRT
I personally miss a good file browser/manager (the Midnight Commander is
OK, but it
doesn't fit to NanoNote's small screen - only a small parts of file names
and so on).
Jiri Brozovsky (jirka)
More information about the discussion