price and power consumption of YA nanonot

Rubén Berenguel ruben at
Wed Jan 26 06:34:01 EST 2011

I think the current Nanonote suffers the same problem my old Pentium
II had. Too little RAM. I had 32 MB, Pentium 2 233Mhz. It is almost
the same as a Nano, as you can see... But the RAM fills up quicker
than anything else. If we could tinker with our nano adding more ram,
or if the next version had, say, 64 in some "standard" format we could
mess and change for 128 or 256 (or dream about 1Gb?), that would be
awesome: we could get the system in a RAM disk and speed up access a
hundredfold (to say a figure). Even 64 MB would allow us to have more
programs running at the same time without clogging. Currently I'm
writing a post about my Debian experience, and I got an screenshot of
Dungeon Crawl (if you like dungeon crawl games, nethack style, you
will have read about this one), and I need 50mb of swap to boot it,
then it works pretty well... But eats a lot of resources while running
and I can't have an emacs in another console (for example).


On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:02, David Kuehling <dvdkhlng at> wrote:
>>>>>> "Werner" == Werner Almesberger <werner at> writes:
>> Jane Andreas wrote:
>>> I have a question about the next Nanonote installment.
>> I think it's a bit early for such specific details :) There's been
>> quite a bit of discussion about desirable feaures a few months ago,
>> but then the focus shifted to other things for a while.
>> Some of my personal "must have" items:
> [..]
> Allow me to throw in yet another (highly subjective) opinion?
>  - Keep it simple, stupid, especially with regard to having to maintain
>  more kernel drivers and user-space hardware tools (a usb host port
>  might open pandora's box).
>  - Keep it cheap enough to attract more developers.
> That said, I don't currently feel that the hardware of the NN is
> imposing limits on what I can use it for.
> cheers,
> David
> --
> GnuPG public key:
> Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205  D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Hardware Discussion List
> Mail to list (members only): discussion at
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe:

More information about the discussion mailing list