Qi-Hardware logo: the basics

Jon Phillips jon at fabricatorz.com
Fri Sep 2 06:12:19 EDT 2011


Can you guys make a simple wiki page detailing this with the files. We
are designers so we need a style guide, right? :)

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jon Phillips <jon at fabricatorz.com> wrote:
> I prefer the simpler grid. What font can fit with qi? What is the font
> from the pcbs? I want to match the pixel perfect logo with the
> standard font used on boards, then we can roll this out across all qi
> sites that use the logo
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Werner Almesberger
> <werner at almesberger.net> wrote:
>> Allin Kahrl wrote:
>>> I took a slightly different approach to deriving the proportions of
>>> Jon's original because I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that it had
>>> been originally drawn pixel-by-pixel.
>>
>> Yes, that was my initial assumption as well. Then I realized that,
>> no matter how I made the grid, the damn thing never quite fit :)
>>
>>> I've attached a cleaned-up version of that result as qilogo_1-1.png.
>>> I've also attached a version zoomed in with a grid drawn in to make
>>> the counting of basic units easier (qilogo_grid.png).
>>
>> Very nice ! I think we need Jon's verdict on what matches his
>> original intentions best, and whether one of the current designs
>> would fit in its present state or if it would need any changes.
>>
>> From a technical point of view, I'd also prefer your simpler grid.
>>
>> - Werner
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qi Hardware Discussion List
>> Mail to list (members only): discussion at lists.en.qi-hardware.com
>> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jon Phillips
> http://fabricatorz.com/
> chat/skype: kidproto | irc: rejon
> +1.415.830.3884 (global) | +1-510-499-0894 (sf)
> +86-187-1003-9974 (beijing)
>



-- 
Jon Phillips
http://fabricatorz.com/
chat/skype: kidproto | irc: rejon
+1.415.830.3884 (global) | +1-510-499-0894 (sf)
+86-187-1003-9974 (beijing)




More information about the discussion mailing list


interactive