Anti Thief For Nano Note

Alexander Stephen Thomas Ross maillist_qi-hardware at
Wed Oct 10 22:46:21 EDT 2012

On 11/10/12 03:17, EdorFaus wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 03:26 AM, Alexander Stephen Thomas Ross wrote:
>> On 11/10/12 01:40, Freemor wrote:
>>> Next version is planned to:
>>>     hashed password
>> For hashing md5,sh1 are cracked. So SHA224 or 256? Is SHA*** over kill?
> I would think that the proper thing to do would be to use the system
> password for the user that is logging in (which is probably root here),
> and to use the existing libraries etc. for that part of it instead of
> reimplementing it yourself.

Doh! Stupid me. I thought that freemor's post implied that was not a 
option. I should have know better. Better go to bed. Oh dear the time...

More information about the discussion mailing list