anelok: a bit of USB
edorfaus at xepher.net
Sat Oct 26 20:25:19 EDT 2013
I can't see why anyone in their right mind would accept such a license,
even for proprietary use. (For open-source it's an obvious non-starter.)
It kind of sounds like they're trying to make sure noone uses their
implementation... But if that's the case, why even provide it?
On 10/27/2013 01:58 AM, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Paul Boddie wrote:
>> It's not "please use freely but only with our stuff", by any chance?
> Of course it is.
> And, as a novelty twist, paraphrasing, "If you create a derivative
> work, you have to tell us so in writing. And by the way, we get to
> own it, too."
> Further descending into madness, they also state, quote "You must
> advise Freescale of any results obtained including any problems or
> suggested improvements thereof."
> It goes on with "8. INDEMNITY. You agree to fully defend and indemnify
> Freescale [blah blah blah]"
> Then, taking a bold step into surrealism, "You must treat the Software
> as confidential information [...]".
> One more gem: accepting the license means you give up fair use:
> "You are not authorized to use any Freescale trademarks, brand
> names, or logos."
More information about the discussion