Nanonote End of life

James "Xakh" Lynch superstuff7 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 11 13:14:50 EST 2014


Seems that way.
On Feb 11, 2014 12:19 PM, "R Paxton" <mrrhq1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Whoa, hold on now. What about the Yi Nanonote, is that now considered
> vaporware?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Mark Tuson <markfptuson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have been thinking this for a couple of years now. My NanoNote died a
>> while back, and I was philosophical about it; I thought we were going to
>> get upgraded devices from time to time. Now if it's all in the past...
>> that's just wrong.
>>  On 11 Feb 2014 10:14, "Christoph Pulster" <Christoph at pulster.de> wrote:
>>
>>> ... thanks to Sharism, which did an aweful job cooperation with the
>>> resellers. I am really deeply disappointed.
>>> There is a ready to sell product, there is also customer demand (small,
>>> but anyway), and Sharism is ignoring the market.
>>> I have 3 units left in stock, after this the Nanonote is past.
>>>
>>> Christoph
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qi Hardware Discussion List
>>> Mail to list (members only): discussion at lists.en.qi-hardware.com
>>> Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qi Hardware Discussion List
>> Mail to list (members only): discussion at lists.en.qi-hardware.com
>> Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Hardware Discussion List
> Mail to list (members only): discussion at lists.en.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20140211/2d1fee9e/attachment.htm>


More information about the discussion mailing list


interactive