Nanonote End of life

Mark Tuson markfptuson at gmail.com
Tue Feb 11 17:30:42 EST 2014


I was thinking about this a little - but I don't think my thoughts could 
be done open-source: I was just thinking of a pocket-size successor, 
initial thought being a 640*480 resistive touchscreen and one of those 
Atom SoCs. But the SoC is non-free, and way too expensive.


On 11/02/2014 21:58, James "Xakh" Lynch wrote:
>
> So. What, realistically, needs to happen to breathe a little gasp of 
> air into this project? Not necessarily getting an nn factory running 
> next week, but to get a design on the table?
>
> On Feb 11, 2014 4:26 PM, "Ron K. Jeffries" <rjeffries at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rjeffries at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Y do you make that mistake?
>     sorry, but I could not resist making a teeny, tiny, gnat-sized pun.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Qi Hardware Discussion List
>     Mail to list (members only): discussion at lists.en.qi-hardware.com
>     <mailto:discussion at lists.en.qi-hardware.com>
>     Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
>     http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qi Hardware Discussion List
> Mail to list (members only): discussion at lists.en.qi-hardware.com
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20140211/245b1d85/attachment.htm>


More information about the discussion mailing list


interactive