Anelok: sealing against physical tampering
werner at almesberger.net
Wed May 7 11:14:15 EDT 2014
Ron K. Jeffries wrote:
> I hate to say it, but that's a significant investment, money that could be
> spent elsewhere.
Hmm, considering how the NSA and related organizations tend to spend
their money, having a 24/7 surveillance team do a bit of state-paid
tourism in Argentina doesn't sound all that bad :-)
> It would be more cost effective to simply eliminate the
> threat, if you understand what I'm saying.
Hah, I always suspected you were our resident CIA operative !
I better lock away my AK-47 then, considering what is known to have
been done in these latitudes ...
> You will be missed my friend. Especially on the irc channel, where you are
> a voice of reason, a paragon of open hardware/software DIY/Maker
> engineering virtue
What a nice epitaph ... *snivel* :)
> Ron K Jeffries (who's not smart enough to be a threat to anyone except
Hah, an unseen danger, not drawing suspicion wherever he is going,
who can strike without a warning and from nowhere. Now there's a
person whose house not only needs to be bugged but to be built with
surveillance equipment. Even the gravel in the driveway ought to
have eyes and ears.
Always remember: if you don't see anything suspicious, you didn't
look hard enough.
The slide with which the NSA justifies the next budget doubling will
probably have your picture on it.
More information about the discussion