%(qi-html-head)s
%(qi-html-body-top)sOn Saturday 22. April 2017 17.31.34 Werner Almesberger wrote: > Paul Boddie wrote: > > I imagine that this is what some mail clients might do. > > I guess so, but I think it might be nice to have a better reading > experience also without having to use a HTML-capable mail reader. > Or am I the only one who uses mutt ? :) Well, it's a nice way of archiving messages, anyway. > > It is obviously nice to have embedded images. I guess the text is > > supposed to be monospaced, but since Debian upgraded to the ESR version > > of Firefox from Iceweasel, I've been waiting for them to fix the font > > assignments that the upgrade broke to no avail. It does make me wonder > > about formatting the tables, > > Ah, interesting. With Chromium (57.0.2987.98), Firefox (52.0.2 and > 53.0), and even rekonq (2.4.2, KDE 4.14.22), all on Ubuntu 16.10, I > get a monospaced font for <pre>...</pre>. > > I've now added > > pre { > font-family: monospace; > } > > to the CSS. Does this help ? No, but the problem is the "upgrade" managing to remove the mapping from "monospace" to a monospaced font. (Someone thinks "DejaVu Sans" is such a font, I imagine.) I guess I'll dig into my font configuration and fix it manually, given that nobody ever got back to me on my bug report. I think "pre" is obliged to be a monospaced font by default, if you look at the HTML and CSS specifications. Paul