This discussion on the list is great. But it might also be useful to maintain (using some web tool, but not on mail list)  a simple, short "Password Safe Requirements" document. 

>> Project description, including 
.. what problem the password safe solves
.. what sort of person will buy the device
.. what the device will do and general characteristics, (but NOT how it is implemented)

>> rough cost targets
     low quantity (n~= 100)
     modest qty (n~=1000)

 >> target date for first proto

>>NON-goals for project (optional, but can be useful)

If you sorta kind like the idea, I volunteer to create the document based on your input.
There are a few web systems designed for collaborative writing, often using Markdown syntax for formatting.
IMO it would be harmless and possibly instructive to experiment with something like that for this brief document.

This is a marketing rather than an engineering document. It is about what is needed by the target customers.

These requirements are already known, but have evolved over multiple messages in the email flow.

As (many...) more people become aware of this (rather cool!) project, having a single solid starting point for current requirements could easily be worth the effort.

Ron K. Jeffries

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Bas Wijnen <wijnen@debian.org> wrote:
Mark's tone sounded like he meant this shouldn't be discussed on this list (but
I may have read him wrong).  To counter that, I like to say I really like this
discussion, especially the part where I get to see some steps on how Werner
goes about designing such a thing and choosing components.  So even though I'm
not participating in the discussion, I wanted to let you know I'm really
enjoying it anyway! :-)


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:45:50AM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Mark Tuson wrote:
> > Is this a Nanonote project,
> Nope. It's simpler than the Nanonote and doesn't run Linux.
> > or is it more dreaming of hardware that'll never exist?
> Hopefully not. My goal is to make at least one working prototype.
> Then we'll have to see what follows.
> If it seems completely useless for the intended purpose, I'll bury
> it. If it's merely awkward but fixable, there'd probably be another
> prototype soon after.
> If it's good, then we can think about finding financing for
> "productizing" and eventually industrially producing it.
> - Werner

Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): discussion@lists.en.qi-hardware.com
Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion